<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Dating Digital Podcast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.datingdigitalpodcast.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.datingdigitalpodcast.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 20:00:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dating Digital Podcast 028: &#8220;Sharp Shards Drop The Ball&#8221; by Scott Perez-Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.datingdigitalpodcast.com/2012/01/07/dating-digital-podcast-028-sharp-shards-drop-the-ball/#comment-942</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Perez-Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 20:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datingdigitalpodcast.com/?p=787#comment-942</guid>
		<description>I agree with Joel&#039;s insight about men vs. women breaking the ice and sending the first message. In my opinion, this is the most fundamentally broken thing about all dating websites.

I&#039;ve heard women complain about getting an inbox full of message that say simply &quot;hey baby&quot; or something otherwise short and useless, but I would argue that it&#039;s more frustrating to send off message after message, and get no reply. I&#039;ve had a few of those &quot;hey baby&quot; message myself, and they&#039;re really not that big a deal.

Maybe the solution is a website to force users to write messages of certain length, as Joel mentioned, but _also_ to prevent users from using the site until they answer a certain percentage of their inbox. I know some sites use a &quot;Thanks, but no thanks&quot; button, and I don&#039;t know why they all don&#039;t use this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Joel&#8217;s insight about men vs. women breaking the ice and sending the first message. In my opinion, this is the most fundamentally broken thing about all dating websites.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard women complain about getting an inbox full of message that say simply &#8220;hey baby&#8221; or something otherwise short and useless, but I would argue that it&#8217;s more frustrating to send off message after message, and get no reply. I&#8217;ve had a few of those &#8220;hey baby&#8221; message myself, and they&#8217;re really not that big a deal.</p>
<p>Maybe the solution is a website to force users to write messages of certain length, as Joel mentioned, but _also_ to prevent users from using the site until they answer a certain percentage of their inbox. I know some sites use a &#8220;Thanks, but no thanks&#8221; button, and I don&#8217;t know why they all don&#8217;t use this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dating Digital Podcast 026: &#8220;Liar Liar Pants On Fire.&#8221; by Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.datingdigitalpodcast.com/2011/11/11/dating-digital-podcast-026-liar-liar-pants-on-fire/#comment-938</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datingdigitalpodcast.com/?p=733#comment-938</guid>
		<description>Thanks for checking us out. Please feel free to share the show with anyone you want!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for checking us out. Please feel free to share the show with anyone you want!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dating Digital Podcast 026: &#8220;Liar Liar Pants On Fire.&#8221; by family vacation ideas</title>
		<link>http://www.datingdigitalpodcast.com/2011/11/11/dating-digital-podcast-026-liar-liar-pants-on-fire/#comment-937</link>
		<dc:creator>family vacation ideas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datingdigitalpodcast.com/?p=733#comment-937</guid>
		<description>I heard a couple of guys talking about this in the New York subway so I looked it up online and found your page. Thanks. I thought I was right and you confirmed my thoughts. Thanks for the work you&#039;ve put into this. I&#039;d love to save this and share with my friends.  
my site is about &lt;a href=&quot;http://cheapfamilyvacations.blogspot.com/&quot; / rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;family vacation spots&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard a couple of guys talking about this in the New York subway so I looked it up online and found your page. Thanks. I thought I was right and you confirmed my thoughts. Thanks for the work you&#8217;ve put into this. I&#8217;d love to save this and share with my friends.<br />
my site is about <a href="http://cheapfamilyvacations.blogspot.com/" / rel="nofollow">family vacation spots</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dating Digital Podcast 019: &#8220;Wachaa!&#8221; by Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.datingdigitalpodcast.com/2011/06/14/dating-digital-podcast-019-wachaa/#comment-595</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 20:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datingdigitalpodcast.com/?p=476#comment-595</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Mike. Sorry it took a bit to sort out. Given our subject matter, I have to keep the spam filter on pretty high in our comment section. - Joel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Mike. Sorry it took a bit to sort out. Given our subject matter, I have to keep the spam filter on pretty high in our comment section. &#8211; Joel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dating Digital Podcast 019: &#8220;Wachaa!&#8221; by Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.datingdigitalpodcast.com/2011/06/14/dating-digital-podcast-019-wachaa/#comment-589</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2011 07:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datingdigitalpodcast.com/?p=476#comment-589</guid>
		<description>Gee Im glad hear E Harmony got axe its been drilled on australian Media along with few others but it has been joke
Dont you think its time we got back reality of relationships human contact
Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee Im glad hear E Harmony got axe its been drilled on australian Media along with few others but it has been joke<br />
Dont you think its time we got back reality of relationships human contact<br />
Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dating Digital Podcast 015: &#8220;Facebook Sword Fight&#8221; by Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.datingdigitalpodcast.com/2011/03/23/dating-digital-podcast-015-facebook-sword-fight/#comment-543</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datingdigitalpodcast.com/?p=425#comment-543</guid>
		<description>I used Facebook heavily during my last campaign to win the heart of a young lady. We didn&#039;t become Facebook friends until after our first sit-down date (although neither of us used the d-word), which was about 6 months after our first meeting. 

Facebook proved to be an instrument of my obsession. I would visit her profile all the time, probably daily or better. I would read between the lines in all her posts and comments to see if she mentioned me. I&#039;d follow the links she posted, watch the videos, read the articles, and even read the books she recommended! It was pretty bad.

Eventually, this obsession became my own undoing. After more than a year of being friends, and spending time together — or as I call it, a &quot;dry courtship&quot; — I felt that she had no interest me. My fears were confirmed when her update appeared, proudly displaying that she is now &quot;in a relationship.&quot; Oddly, many of her old friends were shocked at this, as she is a very secretive gal and apparently hadn&#039;t told them anything, online or otherwise. Even though I had already conceded I&#039;d never be her fella, it was devastating to see those words scrolled across my screen.

She moved to Boston and we don&#039;t really talk any more. We&#039;re still friends on Facebook, but I hardly take notice. A sad story. The lesson learned: don&#039;t become Facebook friends with any _potential_ romantic partners until said romance actually materialises. Too much temptation to snoop. Too easy to obsess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used Facebook heavily during my last campaign to win the heart of a young lady. We didn&#8217;t become Facebook friends until after our first sit-down date (although neither of us used the d-word), which was about 6 months after our first meeting. </p>
<p>Facebook proved to be an instrument of my obsession. I would visit her profile all the time, probably daily or better. I would read between the lines in all her posts and comments to see if she mentioned me. I&#8217;d follow the links she posted, watch the videos, read the articles, and even read the books she recommended! It was pretty bad.</p>
<p>Eventually, this obsession became my own undoing. After more than a year of being friends, and spending time together — or as I call it, a &#8220;dry courtship&#8221; — I felt that she had no interest me. My fears were confirmed when her update appeared, proudly displaying that she is now &#8220;in a relationship.&#8221; Oddly, many of her old friends were shocked at this, as she is a very secretive gal and apparently hadn&#8217;t told them anything, online or otherwise. Even though I had already conceded I&#8217;d never be her fella, it was devastating to see those words scrolled across my screen.</p>
<p>She moved to Boston and we don&#8217;t really talk any more. We&#8217;re still friends on Facebook, but I hardly take notice. A sad story. The lesson learned: don&#8217;t become Facebook friends with any _potential_ romantic partners until said romance actually materialises. Too much temptation to snoop. Too easy to obsess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dating Digital Podcast 013: &#8220;Pre-Valentine Thoughts&#8221; by Tweets that mention The Dating Digital Podcast » Blog Archive » Dating Digital Podcast 013: “Pre-Valentine Thoughts” -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.datingdigitalpodcast.com/2011/02/12/dating-digital-podcast-013-pre-valentine-thoughts/#comment-463</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention The Dating Digital Podcast » Blog Archive » Dating Digital Podcast 013: “Pre-Valentine Thoughts” -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 23:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datingdigitalpodcast.com/?p=318#comment-463</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jeff MacArthur, DatingDigitalPodcast. DatingDigitalPodcast said: Show notes for episode 13 are now available: http://www.datingdigitalpodcast.com/?p=318 How was *your* Valentine&#039;s Day?! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jeff MacArthur, DatingDigitalPodcast. DatingDigitalPodcast said: Show notes for episode 13 are now available: <a href="http://www.datingdigitalpodcast.com/?p=318" rel="nofollow">http://www.datingdigitalpodcast.com/?p=318</a> How was *your* Valentine&#039;s Day?! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dating Digital Podcast 009: &#8220;Deal Breakers Part 2&#8243; by Scott P.</title>
		<link>http://www.datingdigitalpodcast.com/2010/12/04/dating-digital-podcast-009-deal-breakers-part-2/#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 03:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datingdigitalpodcast.com/?p=216#comment-386</guid>
		<description>I can understand where your listener feels somewhat exhausted with online dating from a man&#039;s point of view. In my experience, there is a lot of effort that goes into every message your write. And since most of these message fall on deaf ears, or at least evoke no reply, it can feel very overwhelming and almost as a lost cause.

I would be interested to your experiences overall with online dating. If you have numbers, that&#039;s even better. I&#039;m especially curious to hear about how things work from the ladies&#039; perspective, where their role is mainly in defending themselves from creepy suiters, rather than trying to craft that razor-sharp message that gets a response.

Lately I find that even if I spend a fair few minutes writing a message — referencing her profile, asking questions, using subtle flattery, and quips of humour and wit — there is no guarantee of a reply. Sometimes I think even Ralph Waldo Emerson would be a victim of the numbers game. By my estimation, it&#039;s about 25/4/1 meaning if you send 25 messages, you&#039;ll get 4 replies, and maybe one in-person date. 

Ok, this is getting long so I&#039;ll wrap up for now. Can&#039;t wait for the next episode. Take care,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand where your listener feels somewhat exhausted with online dating from a man&#8217;s point of view. In my experience, there is a lot of effort that goes into every message your write. And since most of these message fall on deaf ears, or at least evoke no reply, it can feel very overwhelming and almost as a lost cause.</p>
<p>I would be interested to your experiences overall with online dating. If you have numbers, that&#8217;s even better. I&#8217;m especially curious to hear about how things work from the ladies&#8217; perspective, where their role is mainly in defending themselves from creepy suiters, rather than trying to craft that razor-sharp message that gets a response.</p>
<p>Lately I find that even if I spend a fair few minutes writing a message — referencing her profile, asking questions, using subtle flattery, and quips of humour and wit — there is no guarantee of a reply. Sometimes I think even Ralph Waldo Emerson would be a victim of the numbers game. By my estimation, it&#8217;s about 25/4/1 meaning if you send 25 messages, you&#8217;ll get 4 replies, and maybe one in-person date. </p>
<p>Ok, this is getting long so I&#8217;ll wrap up for now. Can&#8217;t wait for the next episode. Take care,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dating Digital Podcast 008: &#8220;Deal Breakers Part 1&#8243; by Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.datingdigitalpodcast.com/2010/11/21/dating-digital-podcast-008-deal-breakers-part-1/#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datingdigitalpodcast.com/?p=204#comment-371</guid>
		<description>For me, the dealbreakers are pretty standard: smoking, spitting, children, baggage of past romances, excessive jewelry and make-up (just not the personality I&#039;m into). To this I&#039;d add my own ones, which may come up for some debate.

A deal-breaker for me is if the girl didn&#039;t finish University. Not so much that they &quot;need&quot; a certain degree qualification, but in my eyes, those who drop out of school lack a certain focus on commitment and the dedication to academic and intellectual things.

Although I have been known to drop a few curse words in my everyday speech, women who talk like sailors are deal breakers for me. It&#039;s hard to explain, but this is a subtle art, and one that&#039;s generally better suited to men.

Another deal-breaker is girls who talk like little girls and play that whole princess routine, especially when talking about difficult their life is. &quot;I can&#039;t believe I have to pay rent. That leaves me hardly any money for shopping!&quot; You can picture it. Absolute turn-off. This ties in the general personality I am attracted to, which has a certain working-class practicality to it.

I hate to keep listing these, but I&#039;m really, really turned off by women who eat McDonald&#039;s or other fast food. Not exactly a deal breaker, but my opinion of a person drops through the floor when I hear them lusting over some crappy junk food.

I&#039;ll leave you with those for now.

(Maybe this is why I&#039;m single.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me, the dealbreakers are pretty standard: smoking, spitting, children, baggage of past romances, excessive jewelry and make-up (just not the personality I&#8217;m into). To this I&#8217;d add my own ones, which may come up for some debate.</p>
<p>A deal-breaker for me is if the girl didn&#8217;t finish University. Not so much that they &#8220;need&#8221; a certain degree qualification, but in my eyes, those who drop out of school lack a certain focus on commitment and the dedication to academic and intellectual things.</p>
<p>Although I have been known to drop a few curse words in my everyday speech, women who talk like sailors are deal breakers for me. It&#8217;s hard to explain, but this is a subtle art, and one that&#8217;s generally better suited to men.</p>
<p>Another deal-breaker is girls who talk like little girls and play that whole princess routine, especially when talking about difficult their life is. &#8220;I can&#8217;t believe I have to pay rent. That leaves me hardly any money for shopping!&#8221; You can picture it. Absolute turn-off. This ties in the general personality I am attracted to, which has a certain working-class practicality to it.</p>
<p>I hate to keep listing these, but I&#8217;m really, really turned off by women who eat McDonald&#8217;s or other fast food. Not exactly a deal breaker, but my opinion of a person drops through the floor when I hear them lusting over some crappy junk food.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll leave you with those for now.</p>
<p>(Maybe this is why I&#8217;m single.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Next Topic: Matches by Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.datingdigitalpodcast.com/2010/08/30/ddp-ep-03-topic-matches/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datingdigitalpodcast.com/?p=100#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Glad you like our show.

We don&#039;t have a My Space page, and likely never will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you like our show.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t have a My Space page, and likely never will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

